Step 2 of 9
Read a link table before you copy anything
Understand what a row commits you to, so a link is not mistaken for a purchase.
A link table is a catalogue, not a checkout. Each row is a seller listing that someone has already looked at, and each row will still change — price, stock, options and even the listing itself can move between the moment the table was written and the moment you paste the link.
The work in this step is reading: identifying the platform, the seller, the option set and the price basis, and deciding which of those you need to re-check before the row becomes an order.
Three conditions make a row orderable without returning to the table: an exact option string, an established price basis, and the date the listing was last opened. If any of the three is missing, the row remains a candidate rather than a decision. The stop signal is subtler than a dead link. A listing that still loads but no longer matches the row description, or one whose variant names have changed since the table was written, should be dropped rather than repaired, because a substituted item is no longer the item that was researched and priced. A row that cannot be described in those terms cannot be ordered yet.
Currency conversion deserves its own figure. Prices carried in yuan alongside dollar entries across the same snapshot set imply a CNY/USD ratio of roughly 6.232, which is a reference point rather than a rate available to anyone. The practical test is arithmetic: the $36.18 median row converts to about 225 yuan at that ratio, so a listing priced far from the relationship is usually either a different quantity basis or a stale entry. Recording the assumed ratio with the price makes the conversion reviewable later. A row re-checked months afterwards can only be compared if the ratio originally assumed was written down. It is a cross-check, not a quotation.
Rewriting a variant name in a paraphrase removes the ability to prove what was ordered. Where a seller offers numbered sizes and the order carries a descriptive word instead, the warehouse buyer has to interpret, and interpretation is where the wrong size enters the chain. The cost appears later as a return, a re-order and a second international leg, none of which the seconds saved by retyping offset. Copying the string verbatim, including punctuation the seller uses, is the only version of the instruction that can be checked against the listing page. The paraphrase that reads most naturally to the buyer is the one most likely to be wrong.
The output of this step is a small portable record: link, option string, quantity basis, price with its currency, and the check date. Step 3 pastes that record into the order form, and the same record is what makes a later dispute arguable rather than anecdotal. If the record is thin, the order form inherits the ambiguity, and every subsequent stage is built on a description that was never precise: the warehouse instruction, the photograph comparison, the customs declaration. Writing it down takes less time than the first chase message it prevents. A record written once is reused by every later stage, without being reinterpreted or argued over again.
Have this in hand
- The row you intend to order, including any option or size notes
- The currency shown next to the price
- A note of the date you last checked the row
Check before you move on
0/5 checkedWhat to do, and what a normal result looks like
- Action 1
Open the link once and confirm the listing still exists and still matches the row description.
- Expected result
- The product page loads with the same title and a visible price.
- If it does not happen
- A dead listing is normal on fast-moving catalogues; drop the row rather than searching for a substitute mid-order.
- Action 2
Write down the option set: colour, size and any variant naming the seller uses.
- Expected result
- You have an exact string to paste into the order remark, not a paraphrase.
- If it does not happen
- If the seller uses non-standard variant names, copy them verbatim; paraphrasing is how wrong sizes get ordered.
- Action 3
Record the price and its currency, then convert it with a rate you set yourself.
- Expected result
- You can state the item price in your own currency and explain the rate used.
- If it does not happen
- A catalogue conversion that differs from yours by more than a couple of percent is usually a rounded rate, not an error.
- Action 4
Check the quantity basis: is the price per item, per pair or per set?
- Expected result
- The quantity you enter matches what you expect to receive.
- If it does not happen
- Multi-pack listings are the usual trap. If the listing speaks in sets, order in sets.
How this step usually fails
- Ordering a paraphrased size such as "large, I think" when the seller offers numbered variants.
- Treating a set price as a single-item price, then receiving one third of what was expected.
- Working from a table row saved months earlier without re-checking the listing.
Tools for this step
Currency desk
Convert with an editable rate and see the deviation from the rate implied by this site’s sample.
List exporter
Paste links or titles and get a clean text, Markdown or CSV block with the review date attached.